Disraeli’s philosophy was
militaristic and he appeared to glory in Britain’s imperial possessions.
Certainly, in his ministry there was some very significant foreign policy
campaigns. Whereas Gladstone emphasised the Concert of Europe, which meant
emphasising diplomacy and discussion, as seen in his approach to the
Franco-Prussian War, Disraeli involved the British government in active
campaigns.
The Alabama Arbitration
showed Gladstone to be afraid of conflict. When the Americans demanded
compensation for the sinking of one of their ships he saw it as morally right
that Britain should pay up: the British public were unhappy not because of the
compensation itself, but because Gladstone appeared to quick to reach a
solution. Disraeli was equally critical of Gladstone for not standing up for
British prestige. Disraeli believed that Britain should be perceived as a
powerful country, but that Gladstone was undermining Britain’s standing in the
world.
The same could be said of
Gladstone’s approach to the Franco-Prussian War. Gladstone was concerned not to
involve Britain in this European war, but was criticised by Disraeli for
allowing the future of Europe to be shaped by France and Germany; by opting
out, Britain had ensured peace, but this meant her influence would be limited.
No doubt, Gladstone saw this war as having nothing to do with Britain, and no
doubt he was worried about the financial costs of engagement. Gladstone’s Foreign Policy was a juxtaposition of high morality and a commitment to financial regulation
and retrenchment.
Continue to Part 2
Continue to Part 2